Inquiries
Public inquiries and commissioned studies give the opportunity for all points of view in the community to be heard and considered. All individuals, firms, groups and organisations with an interest in an inquiry can participate in the inquiry.
Fully-matching results
ARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course (PDF - 442k)
Submission 9 for Education Evidence Base View full list
1. Productivity Commission Inquiry into the National Education Evidence Base. Submission on behalf of the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Children and Families over the Life Course Prepared by: Professor Stephen Zubrick Graduate
Date received: 17 May 2016
Tamsin Mathers (PDF - 67k)
Submission 8 for Education Evidence Base View full list
Please implement the recommendations of the 2005 National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy, the 2010 report âHelping People with Dyslexiaâ: A national action agenda report and the âAction Now: Classroom-Ready Teachers report'. My son is
Date received: 13 May 2016
Julia Manickam (PDF - 67k)
Submission 7 for Education Evidence Base View full list
Thank you for receiving my submission. My request is brief. Why are we wasting tax payer money on having yet another enquiry when the recommendations of the previous 2, 3, 4 inquiries have not yet been implemented? What is it so hard for the
Date received: 12 May 2016
Dr Molly De Lemos AM (PDF - 104k)
Submission 6 for Education Evidence Base View full list
Submission to the Productivity Commission Inquiry into the National Education Evidence Base. This submission argues for the introduction of a national Phonics test in Year 1 to assess childrenâs word reading skills in their second year of school.
Date received: 12 May 2016
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) (PDF - 258k)
Submission 5 for Education Evidence Base View full list
Item 5 â Attachment 3 â Appendix 1. Page 2 of 9. AITSL Submission to the Productivity Commission Inquiry into the Education. Evidence Base. Item 5 â Attachment 3 â Appendix 1. 1 | Page. Draft AITSL Submission to the Productivity Commission
Date received: 10 May 2016
Pamela Snow (PDF - 63k)
Submission 4 for Education Evidence Base View full list
The most efficient and effective way forward for the Commonwealth Government would be to over-see an implementation across all states and territories of the 20 recommendations contained within the 2005 National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy.
Date received: 9 May 2016
John Glover (PDF - 48k)
Submission 3 for Education Evidence Base View full list
I have two concerns that appear to come within your Scope. In 2010 PHIDU published an atlas covering aspects of education in South Australia (Understanding educational opportunities and outcomes: A South Australian Atlas). It provided a range of
Date received: 9 May 2016
Sandra Tidswell (PDF - 70k)
Submission 2 for Education Evidence Base View full list
âPlease implement the recommendations of the 2005 National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy, the 2010 report âHelping People with Dyslexia: A national action agenda reportâand the âAction Now: Classroom-Ready Teachers report.â.
Date received: 30 Apr 2016
Kerry Hempsentall (PDF - 321k)
Submission 1 for Education Evidence Base View full list
1. What is the place for NAPLAN Dr Kerry Hempenstall. My submission is in two parts addressing separate issues in the collection and use of data. The first relates to. national assessment, and the second (provided as an attachment) is to describe
Date received: 17 Apr 2016