Inquiries
Public inquiries and commissioned studies give the opportunity for all points of view in the community to be heard and considered. All individuals, firms, groups and organisations with an interest in an inquiry can participate in the inquiry.
Fully-matching results
Freedom Publishers Union (PDF - 60k)
Submission DR163 for Intellectual Property Arrangements View full list
Freedom Publishers Union Authorized by GC Media Publishing Management. Subject: Productivity Commission publication of Intellectual Property Arrangements Draft Report. May 12, 2016. Freedom Publishers Union would like to make a formal Submission in
Date received: 14 May 2016
Martin Goetz (PDF - 186k)
Submission DR160 for Intellectual Property Arrangements View full list
This document is in response to the request by the Australian Commission for feedback on its key points and draft recommendations in Section Chapter 8: Business methods and software patents As background information, I have a long history in the
Date received: 14 May 2016
John Chapman (PDF - 153k)
Submission DR158 for Intellectual Property Arrangements View full list
John Chapman Wilderness Photographer Bushwalking Writer Guide Book Publisher Submission INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS About:: Draft Report Productivity Commission The Productivity Commission has been charged with increasing Innovation in Australia.
Date received: 11 May 2016
Richard Bourke (PDF - 99k)
Submission DR159 for Intellectual Property Arrangements View full list
Dear Sir / Madam, Thank you for the invitation to make a written submission for the draft report of the Intellectual Property Arrangements inquiry. I refer specifically to section 4 of the draft report: Copyright. The Commission notes: âThe
Date received: 7 May 2016
Part B: Geoblocking (PDF - 46k)
Submission DR157 for Intellectual Property Arrangements View full list
To Whom It May Concern at the Productivity Commission, In my main submission, I left you a negative response to your proposed changes to copyright and royalty laws. However, in this one, I am giving you a more positive reaction on another issue
Date received: 5 May 2016
Deborah Abela (PDF - 47k)
Submission DR156 for Intellectual Property Arrangements View full list
Removing the rules about parallel imports and introducing US-style âfair useâwould pose a great danger to Australian-made content. Here are the reasons I believe it should not go ahead. Australian audiences want and deserve their own Australian
Date received: 4 May 2016
Phillip L'Estrelle - Part A: Longevity of copyright (PDF - 47k)
Submission DR157 for Intellectual Property Arrangements View full list
To Whom It May Concern at the Productivity Commission, My name is Phillip LâEstrelle. I recently heard about your proposed changes to copyright and royalty laws, specifically the one regarding reducing the period of time that they last, and as a
Date received: 4 May 2016
Michelle Diener (PDF - 56k)
Submission DR155 for Intellectual Property Arrangements View full list
To the Productivity Commission: Your suggestion of limiting the life of copyright of artistic works is deeply worrying to me, an author of fiction. It seems to me that the system you've considered in order to come to your conclusions in the realm of
Date received: 4 May 2016
Jacqueline Harvey (PDF - 136k)
Submission DR315 for Intellectual Property Arrangements View full list
My name is Jacqueline Harvey and I am writing to express my grave concerns over the Productivity. Commissionâs recommendations with regards to parallel importation of books, terms of copyright being. reduced to 15-25 years from creation and Fair
Date received: 3 May 2016
Sandi Wallace (PDF - 298k)
Submission DR153 for Intellectual Property Arrangements View full list
Crime Writer. sandiwallace.com. facebook.com/sandi.wallace.crimewriter. facebook.com/sandi.wallace.crimewriter. 3 May 2016. Attention: Productivity Commission Submitted online via
Date received: 3 May 2016
- post-draft (468)
- initial (147)