Skip to Content
 Close search

Inquiries

Public inquiries and commissioned studies give the opportunity for all points of view in the community to be heard and considered. All individuals, firms, groups and organisations with an interest in an inquiry can participate in the inquiry.

In Tempore Advisory Pty Ltd (PDF - 15k)

Submission DR150 for Review Of National Competition Policy Arrangements View full list


NCP Discussion Draft. in tempore Advisory December 2004. 1. It’s a paradox that remains unresolved. Acres of prosperity, yet we still have those who seemingly despise Australia’s micro-economic reform efforts. Paul Keating was kind enough at a

Date received: 1 Dec 2004

Pharmacy Guild of Australia # (PDF - 1001k)

Submission DR149 for Review Of National Competition Policy Arrangements View full list


File A1545 WP/:sp. 26 November 2004 Mr Gary Banks Chairman Productivity Commission PO Box 80 Belconnen ACT 2616 Dear Mr Banks Review of NCP Reforms On behalf of The Pharmacy Guild of Australia, I write to provide the following comments on the

Date received: 1 Dec 2004

National Institute of Economic and Industry Research Pty Ltd (NIEIR) (PDF - 9k)

Submission DR148 for Review Of National Competition Policy Arrangements View full list


Re National Competition Policy Review draft recommendation on an independent national review of the passenger transport sector. As a research institute with decades of experience in urban and regional economics, we are puzzled that this draft

Date received: 29 Nov 2004

Maritime Union of Australia (PDF - 15k)

Submission DR146 for Review Of National Competition Policy Arrangements View full list


THE MARITIME UNIONS SUBMISSION TO REVIEW OF NATIONAL COMPETITION. POLICY REFORMS. By the Maritime Union of Australia and the Australian Institute. of Marine and Power Engineers. National development takes place when additional goods and services are

Date received: 29 Nov 2004

Col McIntyre (PDF - 81k)

Submission DR147 for Review Of National Competition Policy Arrangements View full list


SUBMISSION. "THE WAY FORWARD". OVERVIEW. The benefits to the Nation, derived from increasing productivity. are well documented, the reality of global competition is ever present. and threatening and the natural reaction is to want to close our.

Date received: 29 Nov 2004

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission # (PDF - 24k)

Submission DR145 for Review Of National Competition Policy Arrangements View full list


Our Ref: Your Ref: Contact Officer: Jeremy Llewellyn Contact Phone: 03 9290 1893 24 November 2004 NCP Inquiry Productivity Commission PO Box 80 Belconnen ACT 2616 Dear Mr Banks I am writing to you in response to the recent submission, number 134,

Date received: 25 Nov 2004

Australian Telecommunications Users Group Limited # (PDF - 65k)

Submission DR144 for Review Of National Competition Policy Arrangements View full list


1. ATUG Submission. ACCC Review of Telstra Price Control Arrangements. August 2004. 2. Introduction From ATUG’s perspective the Price Control Regime has three outcomes:. To encourage competition by allowing rebalancing of prices between access and

Date received: 25 Nov 2004

Professor Richard Harper (PDF - 72k)

Submission DR142 for Review Of National Competition Policy Arrangements View full list


9th November 2004 C/o Productivity Commission P O Box 80 Belconnen Canberra ACT 2616 I understand that, as part of it’s enquiry into National Competition Policy, the Productivity Commission has pointed to the need to improve the performance of

Date received: 19 Nov 2004

Carol O'Donnell (PDF - 168k)

Submission DR143 for Review Of National Competition Policy Arrangements View full list


1. Submission to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee Inquiry into the Australian Human Rights Commission Legislation Bill (2003) Carol O’Donnell, School of Behavioural and Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University

Date received: 19 Nov 2004

Carol O'Donnell (PDF - 14k)

Submission DR140 for Review Of National Competition Policy Arrangements View full list


Thank you for accepting my earlier submission to your review. Writing to my university colleagues, outlined below, has prompted me to make this new submission, which has the single, vital, reinforcing message that better organization and related

Date received: 18 Nov 2004

Inquiries to show
Filter results
Submission Type
Inquiry : all → review of national competition policy arrangements
Date range