Inquiries
Public inquiries and commissioned studies give the opportunity for all points of view in the community to be heard and considered. All individuals, firms, groups and organisations with an interest in an inquiry can participate in the inquiry.
Fully-matching results
Lauren Jarvis (PDF - 41k)
Submission 958 for Mental Health View full list
23.01.2020 To whom it may concern, I am very worried and concerned regarding the proposal to screen all children under the age of 3 as a âpreventative measure for mental illnessâ. The diagnostic tools are not precise or scientific. Subjective
Date received: 23 Jan 2020
Jane Philip (PDF - 43k)
Submission 1049 for Mental Health View full list
I would like to submit my considerations regarding social and emotional well being checks for children between 0 and 3 years: I believe the screening questions are so subjective that any child could be at risk of being such labeled mentally ill, and
Date received: 23 Jan 2020
Ros Robins (PDF - 40k)
Submission 1071 for Mental Health View full list
22 Jan 2020 To Whom It May Concern, I have seen some recent media on the psychiatric screening of children and babies. I have personally witnessed not only the physical but the mental damage psychiatric treatment does for a person. From not being
Date received: 23 Jan 2020
Julianne Anderson (PDF - 39k)
Submission 1102 for Mental Health View full list
I am a mother of 5. All my children were different and would react different in situations. No matter what age. Below 3 years of age it is really up to us adults to make sure that our children eat well and sleep well as they are growing lots at that
Date received: 23 Jan 2020
Deepti Alurkar (PDF - 55k)
Submission 1066 for Mental Health View full list
Submission :. 22ND Jan 2020. Dear Sir/ madam,. We condemn these studies or research which will let children below 3 get exposed to Mental. screening. This will be very traumatic for children and will lead to them being given medication which may not.
Date received: 23 Jan 2020
Celine Taylor (PDF - 28k)
Submission 1055 for Mental Health View full list
22 Jan 2020. Dear sir, or Madame,. I would like to make it known that I DO NOT believe the screening of young. children (0-3 years), will be of much benefit and in fact, it is waste of money. We have found from the screening was scrapped in 2015,
Date received: 23 Jan 2020
Glen Barnett (PDF - 26k)
Submission 964 for Mental Health View full list
Dear Sir/Madame,. I would like to express my concern at the proposal to screen and drug infants (0-3 years old). This old chestnut was scrapped in 2015 and for good reason. The screening questions were so subjective that any child could be at risk
Date received: 23 Jan 2020
Villoni Wuerfel (PDF - 49k)
Submission 1067 for Mental Health View full list
To Whom it May Concern: I was told by my mother about the âsocial and emotional wellbeing checksâfor 0-3 year olds that she saw in the newspaper and I do not want this to be approved. I am an auntie and I also have a little brother and no child
Date received: 23 Jan 2020
Valerie Hansen (PDF - 49k)
Submission 1093 for Mental Health View full list
I am not in favour of the early intervention for young children. I tender my objection as a mother who has given birth to and successfully raised 5 children. Children are best under the care of loving parents, people who understand them and give
Date received: 23 Jan 2020
John Miller (PDF - 49k)
Submission 1061 for Mental Health View full list
Official Complaint on New Mental Illness Law To whom it may concern, As a parent, the idea of sending 0-3 year olds to be screened for mental illness is absurd. I would never give my child a drug which has as itâs listed side affects violence and
Date received: 23 Jan 2020
- regulation (1,197)
- services (1,091)
- consumers (1,090)
- competition (1,059)
- workforce (1,018)
- health and medical (735)
- ageing (540)
- policy (506)
- overcoming disadvantage (441)
- environment (429)
- agriculture (423)
- children and youth (406)
- disability (406)
- performance (375)
- international trade (355)
- water (327)
- indigenous government services (305)
- not for profit (305)
- accreditation (244)
- manufacturing (227)
- justice (214)
- economic models (134)
- superannuation (134)
- climate (124)
- mining (102)
- small business (78)
- retail (73)
- science and innovation (61)
- energy (58)
- philanthropy
- disability care and support
- caring for older australians
- identifying sectors for reform
- copyright restrictions on the parallel importation of books
- gambling (2010)
- paid maternity
- paternity and parental leave
- workplace relations framework
- murray-darling basin plan
- mental health
- data availability and use
- impacts of native vegetation and biodiversity regulations
- national workers' compensation and occupational health and safety frameworks
- executive remuneration
- contribution of the not-for-profit sector
- broadcasting
- skills and workforce development agreement
- access to justice arrangements
- education and training workforce
- intellectual property arrangements
- right to repair
- implementation review 2023
- natural disaster funding
- national water reform 2020
- consumer policy framework
- public infrastructure
- housing and homelessness agreement review
- government drought support
- closing the gap review
- remote area tax concessions and payments
- national water reform 2024
- superannuation
- assessing efficiency and competitiveness
- review of mutual recognition (2003)
- future drought fund
- regulation of agriculture
- reforms to human services
- science and innovation
- five-year assessment