Inquiries
Public inquiries and commissioned studies give the opportunity for all points of view in the community to be heard and considered. All individuals, firms, groups and organisations with an interest in an inquiry can participate in the inquiry.
Fully-matching results
Shannon Asa (PDF - 77k)
Submission 208 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Brief submission The most vulnerable people in our community are often those who experience poverty and access to basic health care will partly ensure that these people do not fall further into an underclass. Without health care sick and dying
Date received: 25 Jul 2016
Natalie Stevens (PDF - 75k)
Submission 205 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Brief submission I am opposed to the privatisation of our community services as running them for profit has the potential to money away from the most vulnerable people in our society and is a conflict of interest. The not for profit and public
Date received: 25 Jul 2016
Michelle Ricketts (PDF - 55k)
Submission 84 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
The government is voted into power by the people and it is up to the government to look after the people and provide basic health and hospital services for them. Medicare is needed to ensure everyone has access to drs and hospitals. In many cases,
Date received: 25 Jul 2016
Helen Day (PDF - 75k)
Submission 156 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Brief submission I work in rural communities and private sector podiatrists will not come out here to serve the local communities because they don't make any money. We must keep Medicare out of private hands because profits will rule and there will
Date received: 25 Jul 2016
John Brell (PDF - 31k)
Submission 51 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Hand off our medicare system, it works a lot better than the American model. A wealth of historical and international evidence tells us that increasing the presence of private providers in our public healthcare system will undermine the quality and
Date received: 25 Jul 2016
Dr Gwyn Jolley (PDF - 58k)
Submission 72 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Medicare must be protected from privatisation. Any introduction of profit driven health care threatens our excellent universal health care system and will lead to a two tier system and inequity in health outcomes. There is overwhelming evidence from
Date received: 25 Jul 2016
Linley Marshall (PDF - 76k)
Submission 195 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Brief submission Letting private providers into Medicare could see for-profit companies making critical decisions about who gets treated and how. This would lead to a two-tiered system where those with the financial means receive preferential
Date received: 25 Jul 2016
Dr Michael Schien (PDF - 32k)
Submission 52 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
A free, effective and universally accessible health care system is a foundation for any civilised society. Organising healthcare around profit results in distortions, inefficiencies, and the neglect of basic preventative measures in favour of high
Date received: 25 Jul 2016
William Cluney (PDF - 8k)
Submission 112 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Brief submission Letting private providers into Medicare could see for-profit companies making critical decisions about who gets treated and how. This would lead to a two-tiered system where those with the financial means receive preferential
Date received: 25 Jul 2016
Barbara Gruner (PDF - 76k)
Submission 187 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Brief submission Letting private providers run Medicare could result in a two-tier medical system where only those with money could afford adequate treatment and more remote areas might not be able to get the GPs they need. Profit-driven health care
Date received: 25 Jul 2016
- workforce (1,309)
- regulation (1,285)
- consumers (1,256)
- services (1,241)
- competition (1,035)
- health and medical (945)
- ageing (721)
- overcoming disadvantage (555)
- performance (550)
- policy (521)
- children and youth (517)
- disability (517)
- indigenous government services (409)
- not for profit (409)
- agriculture (392)
- international trade (392)
- manufacturing (392)
- environment (371)
- water (263)
- accreditation (260)
- justice (228)
- economic models (204)
- superannuation (204)
- small business (195)
- climate (132)
- mining (108)
- retail (78)
- science and innovation (65)
- energy (62)
- mental health
- philanthropy
- identifying sectors for reform
- national disability insurance scheme (ndis) costs
- early childhood education and care
- national workers' compensation and occupational health and safety frameworks
- workplace relations framework
- murray-darling basin plan
- data availability and use
- impacts of native vegetation and biodiversity regulations
- productivity inquiry (2023)
- broadcasting
- skills and workforce development agreement
- access to justice arrangements
- intellectual property arrangements
- right to repair
- implementation review 2023
- compensation and rehabilitation for veterans
- education and training workforce
- economic structure and performance of the australian retail industry
- review of mutual recognition (2003)
- natural disaster funding
- indigenous evaluation strategy
- national water reform 2020
- public infrastructure
- housing and homelessness agreement review
- science and innovation
- closing the gap review
- remote area tax concessions and payments
- australia's general tariff arrangements
- national water reform 2024
- superannuation
- assessing efficiency and competitiveness
- cost recovery by commonwealth agencies
- future drought fund
- regulation of agriculture
- reforms to human services
- five-year assessment
- early childhood development
- australia's urban water sector