Inquiries
Public inquiries and commissioned studies give the opportunity for all points of view in the community to be heard and considered. All individuals, firms, groups and organisations with an interest in an inquiry can participate in the inquiry.
Fully-matching results
Coutts Communications (PDF - 326k)
Submission 5 for Telecommunications Universal Service Obligation View full list
Page 1. Submission to the: Productivity Commission Inquiry. into the Future Direction of the Universal Service Obligation in. Australia. An independent submission by Professor Reg Coutts. http://www.couttscommunications.com July 2016.
Date received: 19 Jul 2016
Broadband for the Bush Alliance (PDF - 1396k)
Submission 6 for Telecommunications Universal Service Obligation View full list
Broadband for the Bush Alliance P.O. Box 8500. Alice springs NT 0871 ABN 81 609 859 378. 18 July 2016 Mr Paul Lindwall Presiding Commissioner Telecommunications Universal Service Obligation Productivity Commission GPO Box 1428 CANBERRA ACT 2601
Date received: 19 Jul 2016
Centre for Policy Development (PDF - 290k)
Submission 11 for Data Availability And Use View full list
Page 1. Submission to the Productivity Commissionâs Data Availability and Use public inquiry Centre for Policy Development July 2016 Author: Geoff Shuetrim. Page 2. About The Centre for Policy Development (CPD) CPD is an independent, non-partisan
Date received: 19 Jul 2016
Dr Mark Gregory (PDF - 1438k)
Submission 9 for Telecommunications Universal Service Obligation View full list
School of Engineering GPO Box 2476V Melbourne VIC 3001 Australia. ï· www.rmit.edu.au. Page 1 of 5. Productivity Commission Inquiry into the Telecommunications Universal Service Obligation. Submission by. Dr Mark A. Gregory FIEAust, SMIEEE.
Date received: 19 Jul 2016
Optus (PDF - 914k)
Submission 4 for Telecommunications Universal Service Obligation View full list
Public Version | Page 1. Public Version | Page 2. Executive Summary 3. Developments in the sector have removed the need for a USO 5. Historical rationale of the USO 5. Current USO is a failed policy 7. There is no need for a USO 8. No justification
Date received: 18 Jul 2016
Tennant Creek Regional Economic Development Committee (REDC) (PDF - 90k)
Submission 3 for Telecommunications Universal Service Obligation View full list
Disclaimer The Regional Economic Development Committees are independent advisory committees. The views expressed within are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Northern Territory Government. Tennant Creek Regional Economic
Date received: 15 Jul 2016
Fay McCormack (PDF - 66k)
Submission 21 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Submission of Fay McCormack, VIC. Productivity Commission Inquiry into the increased application of competition, contestability and informed user choice to human services. Will lead to a casualised, low skilled workforce employed by for profit
Date received: 15 Jul 2016
Rogers Mbanza (PDF - 68k)
Submission 35 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Submission of Rogers Mbanza, ACT. Productivity Commission Inquiry into the increased application of competition, contestability and informed user choice to human services. we need to carer about vulnerable people as they deserve to survive like
Date received: 15 Jul 2016
Elle Mamalis (PDF - 67k)
Submission 18 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Submission of Elle Mamalis, VIC. Productivity Commission Inquiry into the increased application of competition, contestability and informed user choice to human services. What if it was your child, grand child, loved one or family member who is
Date received: 15 Jul 2016
Matilda Butterworth (PDF - 68k)
Submission 22 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Submission of Matilda Butterworth, VIC. Productivity Commission Inquiry into the increased application of competition, contestability and informed user choice to human services. Putting community services into a competitive market place can only
Date received: 15 Jul 2016
- workforce (1,309)
- regulation (1,285)
- consumers (1,256)
- services (1,241)
- competition (1,035)
- health and medical (945)
- ageing (721)
- overcoming disadvantage (555)
- performance (550)
- policy (521)
- children and youth (517)
- disability (517)
- indigenous government services (409)
- not for profit (409)
- agriculture (392)
- international trade (392)
- manufacturing (392)
- environment (371)
- water (263)
- accreditation (260)
- justice (228)
- economic models (204)
- superannuation (204)
- small business (195)
- climate (132)
- mining (108)
- retail (78)
- science and innovation (65)
- energy (62)
- mental health
- philanthropy
- identifying sectors for reform
- national disability insurance scheme (ndis) costs
- early childhood education and care
- national workers' compensation and occupational health and safety frameworks
- workplace relations framework
- murray-darling basin plan
- data availability and use
- impacts of native vegetation and biodiversity regulations
- productivity inquiry (2023)
- broadcasting
- skills and workforce development agreement
- access to justice arrangements
- intellectual property arrangements
- right to repair
- implementation review 2023
- compensation and rehabilitation for veterans
- education and training workforce
- economic structure and performance of the australian retail industry
- review of mutual recognition (2003)
- natural disaster funding
- indigenous evaluation strategy
- national water reform 2020
- public infrastructure
- housing and homelessness agreement review
- science and innovation
- closing the gap review
- remote area tax concessions and payments
- australia's general tariff arrangements
- national water reform 2024
- superannuation
- assessing efficiency and competitiveness
- cost recovery by commonwealth agencies
- future drought fund
- regulation of agriculture
- reforms to human services
- five-year assessment
- early childhood development
- australia's urban water sector