Inquiries
Public inquiries and commissioned studies give the opportunity for all points of view in the community to be heard and considered. All individuals, firms, groups and organisations with an interest in an inquiry can participate in the inquiry.
Fully-matching results
Stanley Rosenthal (PDF - 74k)
Submission 181 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Brief submission Government services should be directly delivered by government, not outsourced or privatised. The profit incentive can redirect priorities in a way that will damage the support the public needs. Stanley Rosenthal. Brief submission.
Date received: 22 Jul 2016
Donna Azzopardi (PDF - 76k)
Submission 180 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Brief submission As a Community Care Worker I find it offensive that our services will be provided for someone to profit from at the expense of our vulnerable clients and workers conditions and rights. Donna Azzopardi. Brief submission.
Date received: 22 Jul 2016
James Smith (PDF - 79k)
Submission 139 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Brief submission As a taxpayer and voter I do not give permission to any political party to privatise any more of our public services. Privatisation only benefits shareholders, and does nothing for ordinary Australians. Politicians are caretakers,
Date received: 22 Jul 2016
Merriwyn Spicer-Wensley (PDF - 81k)
Submission 138 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Brief submission Public services should be run by the government without the introduction of private businesses. Any introduction of private business introduces a profit margin, taking money away from necessary services, and a profit motive, in
Date received: 22 Jul 2016
Beryl Flower (PDF - 81k)
Submission 137 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Brief submission There is absolutely nothing to be gained by the Australian taxpayer by all this privatisation. Instead, companies who buy in will make whatever profits they can, which is their reason for existence. How many public servants now
Date received: 22 Jul 2016
Vanessa Parkes (PDF - 89k)
Submission 136 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Brief submission Privatisation of human services IS NOT in the best interests of the people. Privatisation makes transparency non-existent, services end up getting cut or weakened, costs of services go up while CEO's pockets are fed AT THE EXPENSE
Date received: 22 Jul 2016
Robert Ramsden (PDF - 59k)
Submission 135 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Brief submission Private companies/persons should have no place in providing human Services.They are governed purely by profit and will only provide the minimum level of service that they can get away with while charging the maximum fee that they
Date received: 22 Jul 2016
Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association (AHHA) (PDF - 560k)
Submission 134 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Productivity Commission Human Services Inquiry â Identifying Sectors for Reform. Productivity Commission Human Services Inquiry. Identifying Sectors for Reform. July 2016. Productivity Commission Human Services Inquiry â Identifying Sectors for
Date received: 22 Jul 2016
Lisa Kolosovs (PDF - 56k)
Submission 133 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Submission of Lisa Kolosovs - NSW. Productivity Commission Inquiry into the increased application of competition, contestability and informed user choice to human services. I've worked in the Community Services sector in a variety of roles over the
Date received: 22 Jul 2016
Stafford Hall (PDF - 37k)
Submission 11 for Identifying Sectors For Reform View full list
Having taken note of many "privatisations" over the years I not the almost complete failure of such. In most instances "privatisation" has resulted in higher costs and less service. I submit privatisation is a complete failure. Stafford Hall.
Date received: 22 Jul 2016
- competition (2,612)
- regulation (2,594)
- services (2,504)
- consumers (2,337)
- workforce (2,173)
- accreditation (1,418)
- children and youth (1,062)
- not for profit (923)
- early childhood (844)
- ageing (842)
- health and medical (804)
- performance (742)
- environment (722)
- policy (643)
- justice (639)
- economic models (624)
- superannuation (624)
- water (591)
- agriculture (525)
- international trade (350)
- climate (274)
- small business (251)
- manufacturing (234)
- disability (218)
- energy (205)
- mining (131)
- indigenous government services (79)
- overcoming disadvantage (79)
- retail (17)
- initial (10,513)
- post-draft (8,805)
- intellectual property arrangements
- education and training workforce
- childcare and early childhood learning
- identifying sectors for reform
- national disability insurance scheme (ndis) costs
- workplace relations framework
- early childhood development
- data availability and use
- access to justice arrangements
- regulation of agriculture
- impacts of native vegetation and biodiversity regulations
- broadcasting
- compensation and rehabilitation for veterans
- national workers' compensation and occupational health and safety frameworks
- economic structure and performance of the australian retail industry
- natural disaster funding
- superannuation
- assessing efficiency and competitiveness
- reforms to human services
- public infrastructure
- mental health
- review of mutual recognition (2003)
- telecommunications universal service obligation
- barriers to effective climate change adaptation
- australia's urban water sector
- economic regulation of airports (2019)
- education evidence base
- national water reform (2018)
- five-year assessment
- murray-darling basin plan
- economic regulation of airport services (2012)
- migrant intake into australia
- competition in the australian financial system
- strengthening economic relations between australia and new zealand
- horizontal fiscal equalisation
- marine fisheries and aquaculture
- tasmanian shipping and freight
- electricity network regulation
- superannuation competitiveness and efficiency
- australia's export credit arrangements